Marriage?
Part 2
For those of you genuinely angered by the previous article and willing to read on. This is the other version.
The current issue of marriage is counter-productive in its focus on "rights", as it has primarily been presented thus far in the public discussion. "Rights" have been inextricably tied to acceptance and validation by the State. It would seem that the goal in doing so, would result in the progressive change in the attitudes of society at large. Moving from "acceptance" as presented in the mass media - think of queers on television and in movies - towards gradual real life acceptance.
Unfortunately, the context in which this is happening is fraught with failure. Those who know their history, understand that any "right" obtained from the State is merely one that has been "granted" to them. I use the term granted, as I heard it once used by a seasoned and worldly feminist activist. Anything "granted" is subject to the will of the State, and thus lacking in permanence.
Genuine societal change is SLOW moving. It takes well over a generation, and constant observance. Today's queer marriage activists would do well to look back and see what it has taken to get where we are today.... and what we have recently lost.
My last remark is not to signify a nostalgic memory. Genuine activism has ranged from radical grassroots approaches to the more moderate academic ones. It's simply fortunate that the former seems non-existent today.
If we do not continue to observe and fight for our basic rights, we will continue to lose more ground. As quickly as public acceptance of queers has grown over the last decade or so, just as quickly can it vanish.
Basic rights force others to recognize WHY we are different. They also force others to recognize HOW we are the same - as in human - as well.
If we - those who believe that queers should be ABLE TO get married - accept this, then we can take our discussion a step forward. We can enliven our debates. We can start looking at some real world issues of marriage - besides the looming one of queer divorce (as in legally divorced).
First off. I am married. I have a kid. My family does not live at nor below the poverty line, but I have known those that do. Dependants. Depending on which country, state, province or district you live in, legal recognition of dependants is critical for those who ARE struggling near, at and below the poverty line. The potential financial assistance available, be it welfare, tax breaks or child tax benefits is significant. Put simply, it helps you to continue living together as a family, besides simply living.
Custody. Again, depending on where you live, this legal recognition coupled with true equality before the law, helps ensure a fair hearing in custody cases. The court could not have to weigh the nature of the divorced spouses' current relationship. Living with two dads or two moms should be irrelevant.
Let's take a moment to remember why we are activists for our causes. Let's try to have a real dialogue.
- anonymous
For those of you genuinely angered by the previous article and willing to read on. This is the other version.
The current issue of marriage is counter-productive in its focus on "rights", as it has primarily been presented thus far in the public discussion. "Rights" have been inextricably tied to acceptance and validation by the State. It would seem that the goal in doing so, would result in the progressive change in the attitudes of society at large. Moving from "acceptance" as presented in the mass media - think of queers on television and in movies - towards gradual real life acceptance.
Unfortunately, the context in which this is happening is fraught with failure. Those who know their history, understand that any "right" obtained from the State is merely one that has been "granted" to them. I use the term granted, as I heard it once used by a seasoned and worldly feminist activist. Anything "granted" is subject to the will of the State, and thus lacking in permanence.
Genuine societal change is SLOW moving. It takes well over a generation, and constant observance. Today's queer marriage activists would do well to look back and see what it has taken to get where we are today.... and what we have recently lost.
My last remark is not to signify a nostalgic memory. Genuine activism has ranged from radical grassroots approaches to the more moderate academic ones. It's simply fortunate that the former seems non-existent today.
If we do not continue to observe and fight for our basic rights, we will continue to lose more ground. As quickly as public acceptance of queers has grown over the last decade or so, just as quickly can it vanish.
Basic rights force others to recognize WHY we are different. They also force others to recognize HOW we are the same - as in human - as well.
If we - those who believe that queers should be ABLE TO get married - accept this, then we can take our discussion a step forward. We can enliven our debates. We can start looking at some real world issues of marriage - besides the looming one of queer divorce (as in legally divorced).
First off. I am married. I have a kid. My family does not live at nor below the poverty line, but I have known those that do. Dependants. Depending on which country, state, province or district you live in, legal recognition of dependants is critical for those who ARE struggling near, at and below the poverty line. The potential financial assistance available, be it welfare, tax breaks or child tax benefits is significant. Put simply, it helps you to continue living together as a family, besides simply living.
Custody. Again, depending on where you live, this legal recognition coupled with true equality before the law, helps ensure a fair hearing in custody cases. The court could not have to weigh the nature of the divorced spouses' current relationship. Living with two dads or two moms should be irrelevant.
Let's take a moment to remember why we are activists for our causes. Let's try to have a real dialogue.
- anonymous



